IMPORTANT NOTICE to all valued readers: Reading the same content on So called PostChronicle or tPCtrends, tPCtrending,tPCtrender, funtuna, newstrem, latestnewser, PingsPedia, Oddepia, wallStreeit, Wal-Martt, PicturesPortal and todaynewsgazette_blogspot_com likes BlogSpots? It is probably because they ripped off TodayNewsGazette.Com
Comments Off on Rihanna Slammed For Fashion Choice

Rihanna Slammed For Fashion Choice


Rihanna Slammed For Fashion Choice-> The star steps out in a pair of thigh-high boots that leave animal activists seeing red. Rihanna’s Snakeskin Boots: Style-Strangling Or Runway Chic?, Looks like love wasn’t the only thing Rihanna found in a hopeless place. While partying in London, the singer flaunted some scaly thigh-high boots that left us gasping for air-and would seriously upset an old friend of Britney Spears!

Paired with a burgundy leather mini-skirt and baggy sweatshirt, the usually fashion-savvy singer’s outfit looked cobbled together like she rolled out of bed. Even with the garish pattern aside, the shape of her boots made Rihanna’s traffic-stopping legs look like stovepipes! Hopefully Rihanna was hiding the perfect top underneath that lazy day sweatshirt that brought everything together.

Snakeskin in very in for the fall season, we get it. But for such a standout piece like humungous snakeskin boots, Rihanna would’ve benefited from matching them with very subtle, more refined pieces-give those boots the complements they deserve! Or just go all out crazy with standout everything because we all love a hot mess fashion extremist. Either way, it’s better to have an outfit that is eye-popping than eye-rolling-you’re Rihanna after all!

Rihanna Slammed For Fashion ChoiceAnd looks like Rihanna has more than style critics to dodge: PETA has already slammed the singer for her wardrobe choice, calling her “callous” and a “freak”.

Please feel free to send if you have any questions regarding this post , you can contact on



Bookmark and Promote!

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are that of the authors and not necessarily that of